
AN IPOD, A SOLAR CHARGER, AND A COUPLE COMPUTERS:

The only human input comes in training the computer to properly analyze the audio. In a series of sample clips, a researcher must first isolate the different sounds made by any species that could be present in the field recordings. Once it learns, the system is fairly accurate — though it isn't perfect. The researchers noted that it sometimes misidentified environmental noises like thunder and wind as apes and frogs. But as the study's lead author, Mitchell Aide, says, it might be the best alternative: "Sending biologists to the field is expensive ... and it is impossible to clone expert field biologists so that they can monitor various sites simultaneously."
While the system provides nearly immediate access to population levels, it'll primarily be used as a way to track animals and insects over years — not hours or days. The system is being detailed in a paper published today on PeerJ, but the research team has already tested it for five years while monitoring an endangered frog. The frog's population declined over the first four years, but shot up during the fifth. It's reportedly a common pattern, but the continued long-term measurements enabled the team to identity it. Now the team hopes that its persistent analysis system can be used elsewhere, providing researchers with an incredibly detailed picture of the environment — and a massive catalog of audio recordings to back it up.
No comments:
Post a Comment